Cybersecurity

me too. it will happen at any moment, if I am correct.

Hi Grégoire, indeed there are similarities between Part-IS and the NIS2. While there are a few differences on their nature in legal and practical terms, I would sum it up by saying that the main objective between those two is different.

The NIS2 Directive aims to provide legal measures to boost the overall level of cybersecurity and preparedness in the EU, both at the level of the MS as well as at the industry level across a number of sectors, including the transport and the aviation sector.

On the other hand, Part-IS aims to provide organisations with the tools to identify and manage information security risks that may have a potential impact on aviation safety. For this reason, Part-IS and its provisions are tailored to the aviation sector and its stakeholders needs, supporting its implementation with relevant AMC/GM material that will published within this year.

Consequently, some security requirements are overlapping between the two rules. Those requirements may be considered fulfilled if complying with the rules as described above, including Part-IS, with the aim of avoiding potential overlaps and duplications on both regulations.

Happy new year everyone in the aviation cyber world. I wish you great success and a year without any hacks, cracks and attacks.

and a pretty good didactic page here from the industry (from 2019, but still very relevant) https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/gnss-interference/
There are also several research projects aiming at the detection of jamming and spoofing, impact reduction and localization of source. I do not have direct links to offer, but I would invite to crawl the sister Agency EUSPA https://www.euspa.europa.eu/euspace-applications/project-portfolio/sear… for a start